Analysis of Postglobalization Concepts and Stages of Evolution of Its Research
https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2024-4-5-15
Abstract
In the last quarter of a century, research and discussion of the phenomenon called postglobalization, affecting all countries of the world and forming new approaches to global socio-economic development, which are designed to ensure its sustainability in the long term, have become increasingly relevant in the scientific literature and world practice and politics. The study of postglobalization has not only a theoretical cross-section and is not limited to the tasks of further development of economic theory as a new mainstream. Understanding of postglobalization as a global process, its characteristics, principles, general and particular mechanisms can provide in practice new opportunities for further progress of individual States, including developing ones. At the same time, changing the role of individual states and their groups in global political, economic, social, cultural, technical and other algorithms will ensure the protection of cultural identity, national security, growth and development. Emerging market economies are particularly interested in this, as they seek to reduce politicization and hegemony, and destroy the neo-colonialist mechanisms and tools that persist in the context of globalization, widely used by the Global North. The article attempts to analyze and systematize the theoretical approaches of anti-globalists, both domestic and foreign, primarily Western, to the development of directions of the post-global world and mechanisms for its provision. The author presents stage-by-stage evolution of the term "postglobalization" as a consequence of various interpretations of reality in different periods of time. At the same time, the author comes to the conclusion that today there is no unified approach to understanding postglobalization as a whole, as well as its elements and directions, which ensures the need and possibility of further development of research.
About the Author
K. I. Kozhevnikov
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin I. Kozhevnikov, Head of the Department of Pricing in Construction and Industry, Institute of Construction and Architecture UrFu.
19 Mira Street, Yekaterinburg, 620062
References
1. Asochakov Yu. Postglobalizatsiya i novye kontury budushchey sovremennosti [Post-Globalization and New Contours of the Future Modernity]. «Teleskop»: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovaniy. ["Telescope": Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research], 2019, No. 1, pp. 19–23. (In Russ.).
2. Vallerstayn I. Evropeyskiy universalizm: ritorika vlasti [European Universalism: the Rhetoric of Power]. PROGNOZIS, 2008, No. 2 (14), pp. 3–56. (In Russ.).
3. Dolgov S. I. Realnost globalizatsii i kritika antiglobalistov [The Reality of Globalization and Criticism of Anti-Globalists]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike [Russia in Global Politics], 2003, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 170–180. (In Russ.).
4. Ivanov D. V. Postglobalizatsiya i perspektivy sotsialnogo razvitiya [Post-Globalization and Prospects for Social Development]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya [Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology], 2019, No. 4, pp. 14–20. (In Russ.).
5. Kalugin O. A. Rossiya v epokhu postglobalizatsii [Russia in the Post-Globalization Era]. Vestnik Kaluzhskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kaluga University], 2017, No. 3, pp. 50–65. (In Russ.).
6. Navrotskaya N. A., Sopilko N. Yu., Kovalchuk M. V. Regionalizatsiya v usloviyakh postglobalnogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Regionalization in the Context of Post-Global Economic Development]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Economics], 2015, No. 4, pp. 7–17. (In Russ.).
7. Panarin A. S. Iskushenie globalizmom [The Temptation of Globalism]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2003. (In Russ.).
8. Ponomarenko E. V. Politicheskaya ekonomiya sanktsiy protiv Rossii, prichiny i sledstviya: vzglyad eksperta [The Political Economy of Sanctions Against Russia, Causes and Consequences: an Expert's View]. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika [International Trade and Trade Policy], 2022, Vol. 8, No. 3 (31), pp. 7–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2022-3-7-23
9. Safonov A. L. Postglobalizatsiya: etnopoliticheskie aspekty [Post-Globalization: Ethnopolitical Aspects]. Istoricheskaya i sotsialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl [Historical and Socio-Educational Thought], 2013, No. 3, pp. 127–134. (In Russ.).
10. Stiglits Dzh. Yu., Charlton E. Spravedlivaya torgovlya dlya vsekh: kak torgovlya mozhet sodeystvovat razvitiyu = Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Contribute to Development. Translated from English N. V. Zaborin, A. D. Zverev, L. S. Golovina. Moscow, Ves Mir, 2007. (In Russ.).
11. Tlostanova M. V. Kritika zapadnogo obraztsa globalizatsii v dokolonialnom proekta [Criticism of the Western Model of Globalization in the Pre-Colonial Project]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy], 2007, No. 1, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.).
12. Fukuyama F. Ugasanie gosudarstvennogo poryadka [The Extinction of the State Order]. Moscow, AST, 2017. (In Russ.).
13. Yakovets Yu. V. U istokov novoy tsivilizatsii [At the Origins of a New Civilization]. Moscow, Delo, 1993. (In Russ.).
14. Cox R. W. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1981, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 126–155.
15. Cox R. W. Structural Issues of Global Governance: Implications for Europe. Gramsci. Historical Materialism and International Relations, еdited by St. Gill. Toronto, York University, 1993, pp. 259–289.
16. Cox R. W., Sinclair T. J. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
17. Cox R. W., Schechter М. G. The Political Economy of a Pluralism: World: Critical Reflections on Power, Morals and Civilization. New York, Routledge, 2002.
18. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Redwood City, Stanford University Press, 1990.
19. Helleiner E. Post-Globalization. Is the Financial Liberalization Trend Likely to be Reversed? States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization, edited by R. Boyer, D. Drache. Routledge, 1996, pp. 193–210.
20. Krugman P. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. New York, W. W. Norton, 2009.
21. Moolakkattu J. S., Robert W. Cox and Critical Theory of International Relations. International Studies, 2009, Vol. 46, Issue 4, pp. 439–456.
22. Orr M. The Failure of Neoliberal Globalization and the End of Empire. Globalization in the 21st Century, 2010, pp. 177–197. DOI:10.1057/9780230106390_9
23. Sibert H., Klodt H. Towards Global Competition: Catalyst and constraints. Kiel, 1998, December.
24. Sklias P., Maris G. Globalization and the Instability of Global Financial Markets. IJER, 2013, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 277–287.
25. Stiglitz J. La Grande Désillusion. Editure Fayard. Paris, 2002.
26. Waters M. Globalization (Key Ideas). 2nd ed. Routledge, 2001, pp. 20–40.
Review
For citations:
Kozhevnikov K.I. Analysis of Postglobalization Concepts and Stages of Evolution of Its Research. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2024;10(4):5-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2024-4-5-15
Views:
182
Email this article 
