Protection of Rights in International Trade of Intellectual Property in the EAEU
https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2025-1-61-73
Abstract
An entrepreneur or other representative of the business environment producing and selling products (works, services) containing intellectual property objects must ensure the rights associated with them. This will protect investments in the results of intellectual activity, as well as means of individualization (trademarks, etc.), which will ensure the commercial success of the enterprise in the selected market segment, provide an opportunity for an economic entity to take more advantageous market positions compared to competitors and, as a result, increase the volume of production and sales of products (works, services) in the domestic and international markets. In accordance with Article 1225 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, protected intellectual property objects (IPO) include copyright and related rights. The purpose of the article is to identify the differences in terminology between the understanding of the definitions of "counterfeit goods (counterfeit)" and "falsified goods (counterfeit)", to study the requirements of the legislation of the EAEU and the Russian Federation in this area and to determine the directions for improving the efficiency of customs authorities in the field of protecting rights to IPO. The subject of the research is the study of the work of the customs authorities of the Russian Federation aimed at preventing violations in the field of intellectual property. The main research methods are the genesis of the essence and content of basic concepts, comparative analysis, generalization, etc. The results of the work illustrate the need for further development of product labeling, as well as the adoption of active measures to maintain the Unified Customs Register of Intellectual Property Objects of the EAEU Member States.
About the Authors
I. A. Kutenina
Kurgan State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Kutenina, PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Public and municipal administration, foreign economic activity and management
63, building 4 Sovetskaya Street, Kurgan Region, Kurgan, 640002
N. P. Chernyavskaya
Kurgan State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda P. Chernyavskaya, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Public and municipal administration, foreign economic activity and management
63, building 4 Sovetskaya Street, Kurgan Region, Kurgan, 640002
References
1. Aleksandrova L. I. Kontrafakt kak kriminalnoe yavlenie: sredstva protivodeystviya [Counterfeiting as a Criminal Phenomenon: Means of Counteraction]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta [Legal Bulletin of Samara University], 2021, No. 3, pp. 59–65. (In Russ.)
2. Afonin P. N., Lebedeva E. S. Analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya tamozhennogo kontrolya obektov intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Analysis of the Current State of Customs Control of Intellectual Property Objects]. BIT, 2019, No. 1 (9), pp. 27–32. (In Russ.)
3. Afonin P. N., Lebedeva E. S. Kontseptualnaya model sovershenstvovaniya informatsionno-tekhnicheskogo vzaimodeystviya tamozhennykh organov v sfere zashhity intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Conceptual Model for Improving Information and Technical Interaction of Customs Authorities in the Field of Intellectual Property Protection]. BIT, 2019, No. 2 (10), pp. 45–50. (In Russ.)
4. Berlova N. V., Chadova T. V. Identifikatsiya kontrafaktnykh tovarov pri tamozhennom kontrole [Identification of Counterfeit Goods During Customs Control]. Tamozhennaya politika Rossii na Dalnem Vostoke [Customs Policy of Russia in the Far East], 2018, No. 2 (83), pp. 47–58. (In Russ.)
5. Bogdanov Yu. V., Sorokina O. V. Tamozhennye aspekty borby s kontrafaktnymi tovarami [Customs Aspects of The Fight Against Counterfeit Goods]. Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta [Bulletin of the Expert Council], 2020, No. 2-3 (21-22), pp. 42–48. (In Russ.)
6. Gladchenko V. A., Mikhaylova S. A. Osobennosti informatsionnotekhnicheskogo vzaimodeystviya edinoy natsionalnoy sistemy tsifrovoy markirovki i proslezhivaemosti tovarov «chestniy znak» i edinoy avtomatizirovannoy informatsionnoy sistemy tamozhennykh organov pri sovershenii tamozhennykh operatsiy, svyazannykh s vypuskom vvozimoy markiruemoy produktsii [Features of Information and Technical Interaction of the Unified National System of Digital Marking and Traceability of Goods "Honest Sign" and the Unified Automated Information System of Customs Authorities When Performing Customs Operations Related to the Release of Imported Marked Products]. Evrazijskij Soyuz Uchenyh Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh [Eurasian Union of Scientists], 2020, No. 7-4 (76), pp. 10–17. (In Russ.)
7. Kovarda V. V., Laptev R. A., Timofeeva O. G. Perspektivy povysheniya urovnya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti v kontekste tsifrovizatsii ekonomicheskikh protsessov posredstvom razvitiya sistemy proslezhivaemosti v EAES [Prospects for Increasing the Level of Economic Security in the Context of Digitalization of Economic Processes Through the Development of a Traceability System in the EAEU] Vestnik evraziyskoy nauki [Bulletin of Eurasian Science], 2020, No. 5. (In Russ.)
8. Lubik A. F. Sistema proslezhivaemosti tovarov kak instrument borby s vvozom i oborotom kontrafaktnykh tovarov [The System of Traceability of Goods as a Tool for Combating the Import and Circulation of Counterfeit Goods] Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Customs Academy], 2020, No. 2, pp. 165–173. (In Russ.)
9. Maslova I. S., Isaeva K. N. Ponyatie kontrafakta v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve zakonodatelstve [The Concept of Counterfeit in Russian Legislation]. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve [Gaps in Russian Legislation], 2018, No. 5, pp. 74–76. (In Russ.).
10. Nemirova T. A. Deyatelnost tamozhennykh organov po zashhite intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Activities of Customs Authorities to Protect Intellectual Property]. Epokha nauki [The Age of Science], 2017, No. 12, pp. 52– 56. (In Russ.).
11. Salnikova A. V. Sovremenniy rossiyskiy rynok kontrafaktnoy produktsii: vedushhie faktory i tendentsii [Modern Russian Market of Counterfeit Products: Leading Factors and Trends]. Elektronniy nauchniy zhurnal «Vek kachestva» [Electronic Scientific Journal "Vek Kachestva"], 2024, No. 3, pp. 69–89. (In Russ.)
12. Sinyagovskaya E. S., Kuroptev N. B. Deyatelnost tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v ramkakh funktsionirovaniya sistemy proslezhivaemosti tovarov [Activities of the Customs Authorities of the Russian Federation within the Framework of the Functioning of the Goods Traceability System]. BIT, 2020, No. 2 (14), pp. 42–47. (In Russ.)
13. Khaynova E. L. Analiz deyatelnosti tamozhennykh organov po borbe s oborotom kontrafaktnoy produktsii na primere Vladimirskoy tamozhni [Analysis of the Activities of Customs Authorities in Combating the Circulation of Counterfeit Products Using the Example of Vladimir customs]. Skif, 2019, No. 5–1 (33), pp. 14–19. (In Russ.)
14. Chadova T. V., Berlova N. V. Problemy vyyavleniya kontrafaktnykh i falsifitsirovannykh tovarov vo vneshnetorgovoy deyatelnosti [Problems of Identifying Counterfeit and Falsified Goods in Foreign Trade Activities]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Customs Academy], 2019, No. 1, pp. 85–89. (In Russ.)
15. Shaurina O. S., Krivushina O. A. O markirovke tovarov kontrolnymi (identifikatsionnymi) znakami v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the Marking of Goods with Control (Identification) Marks in the Russian Federation]. Vek kachestva [Century of Quality], 2019, No. 4, pp. 167–183. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kutenina I.A., Chernyavskaya N.P. Protection of Rights in International Trade of Intellectual Property in the EAEU. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2025;11(1):61-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2025-1-61-73
Views:
107
Email this article 
