ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM AVAILABILITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR THE TRANSITION TO EDUCATION 2.0
https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2023-3-155-163
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to highlight and detail the issue of the availability of the higher education system in the Russian Federation for the transition to the new concept of Education 2.0. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: descriptive methods, statistical methods, economic and mathematical methods, as well as methods of group expert assessment. As a result of the work done, the average level of availability of the higher education system in the Russian Federation for the transition to the new concept of Education 2.0 for a certain date was determined with high accuracy, and its constituent elements were also detailed within the middle levels for key projections: information, technological, legal, social, and economic. As a result, it was concluded that the entire system of higher education in the Russian Federation is not sufficiently prepared in the near term for the analyzed transition. As a recommendation in the area under consideration, it was suggested that it is advisable to implement the Education 2.0 concept locally in higher educational institutions in the Russian Federation with a high relative level of project funding (for example, in extended education programs, in retraining senior management personnel, as well as in the framework of specialized MBA and DBA programs). The novelty of the work done by the authors is determined by the projection structuring of the analyzed problem within five interconnected fields, as well as the obtaining of quantitative results with a high level of objectivity in the presentation of quantitative and qualitative results achieved including through the use of a complex of logically and analytically processed opinions of qualified experts.
About the Author
E. A. NikolaevaRussian Federation
Elena A. Nikolaeva, PhD, Deputy Director of the Higher School of Economics and Business of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115054
References
1. Anderson P. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education. Retrieved, 2007, February. Available at: http://sitecore.jisc.ac.uk/ media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
2. Barak M. Transition from Traditional to ICT-enhanced Learning Environments in Undergraduate Chemistry Courses. Computer Science and Education, 2018, No. 48 (1), pp. 30–43.
3. Carlisle D. L., Weaver, G. C. STEM Education Centers: Catalyzing the Improvement of Undergraduate STEM Education. International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1), 2018, November.
4. Kalantzis M. Sources of Evidence-of-Learning: Learning and Assessment in the Era of Big Data. Open Review of Educational Research, 2015, No. 2 (1), pp. 194–217.
5. Gaffar K., Singh L. Supporting Computer Science Education Using Web 2.0 and Social Software. Journal of Arts, Science and Technology, 2012, No. 5 (1), pp. 65–91.
6. Gerstein J. Education 3.0: Altering Round Peg in Round Hole Education, 2013. Available at: http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress. com/2013/06/09/education-3-0-altering-round-peg-in-round-hole-education/
7. Schachter R. Schools Embrace Project-Based Learning 2.0, 2013, December. Available at: http://www.districtadrninistration.com/article/ schools-embraceproject-based-learning-20.
Review
For citations:
Nikolaeva E.A. ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM AVAILABILITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR THE TRANSITION TO EDUCATION 2.0. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2023;9(3):155-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2023-3-155-163