ASSESSMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TRAD EFACILITATION MEASURES
https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2018-4-105-116
Abstract
The article discusses some approaches to evaluation of trade facilitation measures developed by international economic organizations. The main benchmarks showing the effect of foreign trade policy conducted by public authorities have been identified. The author named the main evaluation criteria applied to the analysis of measures implemented in order to simplify trade procedures, and also considered the approaches (general, special) to the analysis of the effectiveness of public policy in this area. Using the results of the ranking of the EAEU member states as an example, a comparative analysis was made of various ratings used in evaluating the implementation of trade facilitation initiatives, which are compiled according to different approaches to the analysis of the effectiveness of trade facilitation measures. The research shows that the use of the approaches described in the article has certain limitations, and to obtain a reliable evaluation, it is necessary to betake a comprehensive analysis. Also, these limitations should be taken into account when using statistical information from the sources considered when building economic models.
About the Author
Tatiana S. NenadyshinaRussian Federation
Post-Ggraduate Student of the Department of World and National Economy
4A Pudovkina, Moscow, 119285
References
1. Anderson J. E., Wincoop E. Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, Vol. 42, pp. 691–751.
2. Behar A. Do Mangers and Experts Agree? A Comparison of Alternative Sources of Trade Facilitation Data. Economics Series Working Papers, 2010, No. 503.
3. Chen N., Novy D. International Trade Integration: A Disaggregated Approach. CEP Discussion Paper: Centre for Economic Performance London School of Economics and Political Science, 2009, No. 908.
4. De P. Trade Facilitation in India: An Analysis of Trade Procedures. An Initiative of UNESCAP and IDRC. Canada, 2011.
5. Doing Business 2018. Available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org.
6. ESCAP-World Bank Trade Cost Database. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/resources/escap-world-bank-trade-cost-database.
7. Hummels D., Schaur G. Time as a Trade Barrier. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012.
8. Moïsé E., Orliac T., Minor P. Trade Facilitation Indicators: The Impact on Trade Costs. Trade Policy Working Papers, 2011, No. 118.
9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/trade/facilitation/indicators.htm.
10. The Global Facilitation Partnership for Transportation and Trade. Available at: http://www.gfptt.org.
11. The World Bank’s «Ease of doing Business» Report Faces Tricky Questions. The Economist. Available at: https://www.economist.com/financeand-economics/2018/01/20/the-world-banks-ease-of-doing-business-reportfaces-tricky-questions.
12. Trade Facilitation and Global Economy. Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/trade-facilitation-and-the-globaleconomy_9789264277571-en.
13. Trade Facilitation and the Global Economy. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2018.
14. Trade facilitation indicators Available at: http://www.oecd.org/trade/facilitation/indicators.htm.
15. Viljoen W. The Evolution of the Trade Facilitation Concept, Best Practices and the Tripartite Comprehensive Tripartite Trade and Transport Facilitation Programme (CTTFP). Available at: http://www.ictsdsymposium.org/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/11_Evolutionof-the-trade-facilitation-concept-best-practices-and-the-CTTTFP_20131017.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Nenadyshina T.S. ASSESSMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TRAD EFACILITATION MEASURES. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2019;(1):105-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2018-4-105-116