Comparative analysis of industrial policy in Russia, the USA and Germany
Abstract
In this article the author has attempted to identify the principles and laws of industrial policy in the countries, where differ considerably level of state participation in economic processes. The relevance of this article due to the need to create in Russia a state industrial policy that will meet the requirements of time and withstand the economic crisis. In this article, the author concludes that in the external variety of different formal structures that implement industrial policies in the different countries, there are common characteristics of institutional regulation. Particular importance is given to the formation in Russia of legal definitions, institutionalized industrial policy, highlights the priority of the formation of the legal system for its implementation.
About the Author
V. V. Rodina
Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Political Science, Assistant Deputy Minister,
Kitaygorodsky Passage, 7, Moscow, 109074
References
1. PhD in Political Science, Assistant Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation. Address: Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Kitaygorodsky Passage, 7, Moscow, 109074,
2. Bannikov A. Yu. Klaster kak element territorial'noy organizatsii promyshlennosti [Cluster as Part of the Territorial Organization of Industry], Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya v XXI veke: vyzovy i vozmozhnye otvety : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Socio-economic Geography in the XXI Century: Challenges and Possible Answers : Materials of International scientific conference], aditor by A. G. Druzhinina. Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.).
3. Drozhzhina E. V. Promyshlennaya politika evropeyskikh stran : doklady instituta Evropy № 259 [The Industrial Policy of the European Countries : Reports of the European Institute No. 259]. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.).
4. Zaytseva N. B. Strukturno-territorial'nye aspekty integratsii promyshlennosti vostochnykh zemel' Germanii. Dis. kand. geogr. Nauk [Structurally-Territorial Aspects of the Integration of Industry of the Eastern Lands of Germany. PhD geogr. sci. diss]. Saint Petersburg, 2005. (In Russ.).
5. Kostikova N. B. Strukturno-territorial'nye izmeneniya v khozyaystve Meklenburg Peredney Pomeranii posle vossoedineniya Germanii [Structural and Territorial Changes in the Economy of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania After Reunification], Vestnik geograficheskogo fakul'teta [Vestnik of the Faculty of Geography], 2005, No. 5. (In Russ.).
6. Rodina V. V. Imidzh rossiyskoy promyshlennosti kak faktor ee konkurentosposobnosti [The Image of the Russian Industry as a Factor in Its Competitiveness], Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2016, No. 1, pp. 89–93. (In Russ.).
7. Smirnov E. N. Transnatsional'nye korporatsii avtomobil'-noy promyshlennosti Germanii: strategii razvitiya : dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk [Multinationals Automotive Industry in Germany: Development Strategy. PhD econ. sci. diss]. Moscow, 2004.
8. Rattner S. Overhaul: An Insider’s Account of the Obama Administration’s Emergency Rescue of the Auto Industry. New York : Houghton, 2010. (In Russ.).
9. Rodrik D. The Return of Industrial Policy. Project Syndicate, 2010. April 12. Available at: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ the-return-of-industrial-policy
Review
For citations:
Rodina V.V. Comparative analysis of industrial policy in Russia, the USA and Germany. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2016;(2):95-106. (In Russ.)
Views:
717
Email this article 
