The Eurasian Economic Union and the main development trends of the integration megaprojects
Abstract
Globalization and integration are the main trends of modern development of the world economy. And the formation of economic unions is an important part of this global process, which is covering all regions of the world. New centers of geopolitical and geo-economic global architecture have appeared. Vladimir Putin noted: «From such particular integration«building blocks» a more sustainable global economy can be developed». Activities in the framework of the integration mega-projects show that the development of cooperation and deepening of regional integration connections also contribute to important structural changes and crucial effects in the global economy, which set the pace and features of its transformation in the current environment. Integration processes in the Eurasian space are especially clear example of it. For centuries, the Eurasian idea was implemented in a variety of associations. The creation of the Eurasian economic Union brought the Eurasian integration project on a new level and opened broad prospects for economic development, has created additional competitive advantages in the global arena. This will allow our states to effectively fit into the modern global economy, reduce economic risks and take advantage of the international trading system.
About the Author
M. D. Valovaya
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor of the International Business and Customs Affairs Department,
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Analiticheskie doklady Mezhdunarodnogo valyutnogo fonda, Vsemirnogo banka, Fitch, Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii [Analytical Reports of the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, Fitch, Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation], IMEMO RAN, 2014–2016. (In Russ.).
2. Kissindzher G. O Kitae [About China], translate from English by V. I. Verchenko. Moscow, AST, 2014. (In Russ.).
3. Baldwin R. E., Wyplosz C. The Economics of European Integration. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2012.
4. Bermann G. Subsidiarity and the European Community, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 1993, Vol. 17, pp. 89–99.
5. Cass D. The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community, Common Market Law Review, 1992, Vol. 29, pp. 1107–1136.
6. China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious and Creative High Income Society. Conference Edition. Washington, 2012.
7. Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, Official Journal of the European Union, 2009, L 78/1.
8. DeRosa D. A. The Trade Effects of Preferential Arrangements: New Evidence from the Australia Productivity Commission, Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper WP07-1, 2007, January.
9. Emiliou N. Subsidiarity: an Effective Barrier Against «The Enterprises of Ambition»? European law review, 1992, Vol. 17, pp. 383–397.
10. European Integration: Theories and Approaches, еditor by H. Michelmann, P. Soldatos. Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 1994.
11. Fontaine P. Europe in Ten Points. 2nd ed. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1995.
12. Mitrany D. A Working Peace System. Chicago, Quadrangle Books, 1966, pр. I–1137.
13. Monnet J. A Ferment of Change, Journal of Common Market Studies, 1962, No. 1, pp. 211.
14. Pennings F. Is the Subsidiarity Principle Useful to Guide the European Integration Process? Tilburg Foreign Law Review, 1992, Vol. 2, pp. 153–163.
15. Pentland C. International Theory and European Integration. – London : Faber & Faber Ltd., 1973.; Pistone S. Altiero Spinelli and the strategy for the United States of Europe, The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, editor by B. Nelsen and A. Stubb. Boulder, Reinner, 1994.
16. Pistone S. Altiero Spinelli and the Strategy for the United States of Europe, The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, editor by B. Nelsen and A. Stubb. Boulder, Reinner, 1994.
17. PricewaterhouseCoopers : Prognoz razvitiya mirovoy ekonomiki s 2015 do 2050 goda [The Forecast of Development of World Economy from 2015 to 2050]. Available at: http://gtmarket.ru/news/2015/ 02/11/7089
18. Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 On Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products And Foodstuffs, Official Journal of the European Union, 2012, L 343, 012, pp. 0001–0029.
19. Reshaping EU–US Relations: a Concept Paper, editor by R. Prodi, G. Verhofstadt (co-chairs), J. Buzek, E. Davignon, J. Delors, J. Fischer, P. Lipponen, T. Padoa-Schioppa, Notre Europe, 2010, March 4, pp. 12.
20. Risse Th. Neofunctionalism, European Identity and the Puzzles of European Integration, Journal of European Public Policy, 2005, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 291.
21. Toth A. The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty, Common Market Law Review, 1992, Vol. 29, pp. 1079–1106.
22. UNCTAD. Handbook of International Statistics 2011. Geneva, 2011.
23. Vause G. The Subsidiarity Principle in European Union law — American Federalism Compared, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 1995, Vol. 27, pp. 61–81.
24. Wistrich E. The United States of Europe. London, Routledge, 1994.
Review
For citations:
Valovaya M.D. The Eurasian Economic Union and the main development trends of the integration megaprojects. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2016;(4):52-65. (In Russ.)
Views:
386
Email this article 
