mttpМеждународная торговля и торговая политикаInternational Trade and Trade Policy2410-73952414-4649ФГБОУ ВО "Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова"10.21686/2410-7395-2021-3-64-78mttp-468Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ТОРГОВЛЯИмперативы торговой политики Республики Корея: влияние пандемии COVID-19South Korea’s trade policy imperatives: the impact of COVID-19 pandemicКуклаМ. П.KuklaM. P.

Марина Петровна Кукла, кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры корееведения

690922, Приморский край, г. Владивосток, о. Русский, пос. Аякс, 10

Marina P. Kukla, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Korean Studies

10 Ajax, Russky isl., Vladivostok

kukla.mp@dvfu.ruДальневосточный федеральный университетРоссияFar Eastern Federal UniversityRussian Federation202113102021736478Copyright © Кукла М.П., 20212021Кукла М.П.Kukla M.P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/view/468

В статье дается анализ целей и императивов торговой политики Республики Корея до пандемии COVID-19 и с учетом ее последствий. Торговая политика страны основана на необходимости синхронизации интересов государства, крупного, малого и среднего бизнеса. С этой целью создана система разделения полномочий в сфере торговой политики и дипломатии, зарекомендовавшая себя как весьма эффективная. Несмотря на положительную динамику экспорта страны, ситуация с COVID-19, усилившая тенденции протекционизма в международной торговле, подчеркнула хроническую структурную проблему торговли Республики Корея, – зависимость от ограниченного числа контрагентов и товаров. Задача противодействия протекционизму вместе с необходимостью диверсификации товарной и географической структуры экспорта предполагает два направления работы: укрепление промышленной структуры, способной производить конкурентоспособные товары, и расширение сети соглашений о свободной торговле. Необходимость оперативного решения логистических проблем, влияние глобальных трендов цифровизации и декарбонизации заставляют Корею опираться на идею стимулирования свободной торговли. Руководство страны продолжает критиковать протекционизм, следуя идее сбалансированного использования двусторонних и многосторонних инструментов либерализации.

The article analyses the goals and imperatives of the Republic of Korea’s trade policy before the COVID-19 pandemic and taking into account its consequences. The RoK's trade policy aims to synchronize the interests of the state, conglomerates and small and medium-sized enterprises. For this purpose, a system of division of powers in the field of trade policy and diplomacy has been designed, which has proven to be very effective. The COVID-19 situation, which has exacerbated the growing trend of protectionism in international trade, highlighted the chronic structural problems of trade in the Republic of Korea of trade in the area of geographical and commodity structure – despite the positive dynamics of the country's exports. The challenge of countering protectionism, coupled with the need to diversify the commodity and geographic structure of exports, implies two areas of work: strengthening an industrial structure capable of producing competitive goods and expanding the network of free trade agreements. The need to address logistical problems, digitalization, and the trend towards decarbonization forces Korea to rely more heavily on the idea of promoting free trade. The country's leadership continues to criticize protectionism, guided by the idea of a balanced use of bilateral and multilateral instruments of liberalization.

внешняя торговляторговая политикаторговая дипломатиясоглашения о свободной торговлеtrade policyforeign tradetrade diplomacyfree trade agreementsReferencesКоргун И. А., Зуев В. Н. Торговая политика Республики Корея как инструмент реализации национальных экономических интересов страны // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. – 2020. – Т. 15, №2. – С. 236–254.Korgun I. A., Zuev V. N. Torgovaya politika Respubliki Koreya kak instrument realizatsii natsionalnykh ekonomicheskikh interesov strany [The Trade Policy of the Republic of Korea as a Tool for the Realization of the National Economic Interests of the Country], Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika, 2020, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 236–254. (In Russ.).Латышов А. В. Тенденции внешней торговли Республики Корея // Международная торговля и торговая политика. – 2018. № 2 (14). – С. 104–112.Latyshov A. V. Tendentsii vneshney torgovli Respubliki Koreya [Trends in the Republic's Foreign Trade Korea], Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika, 2018, No. 2 (14), pp. 104–112. (In Russ.).Пак С. Политика Южной Кореи в сфере торговли и стратегия страны в отношении региональных и глобальных инициатив экономической интеграции на примере Всеобъемлющего регионального экономического партнерства (ВРЭП) и Транстихоокеанского партнерства (ТТП) // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. – 2016. – Т. 11. – № 4. – С. 177–204.Pak S. Politika YUzhnoy Korei v sfere torgovli i strategiya strany v otnoshenii regionalnykh i globalnykh initsiativ ekonomicheskoy integratsii na primere Vseobemlyushchego regionalnogo eko-nomicheskogo partnerstva (VREP) i Transtikhookeanskogo partnerstva (TTP) [South Korea's Trade Policy and the Country's Strategy for Regional and Global Economic Integration Initiatives on the Example of the Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership (CEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)], Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika, 2016, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 177–204. (In Russ.).Сутырин С. Ф., Коргун И. А. Торговая политика Республики Корея: выбор оптимальной траектории либерализации// Торговая политика. – 2015. – № 2. – C.9–33.Sutyrin S. F., Korgun I. A. Torgovaya politika Respubliki Koreya: vybor optimalnoy traektorii liberalizatsii [Trade Policy of the Republic of Korea: Choosing the Optimal Path of Liberalization], Torgovaya politika, 2015, No. 2, pp. 9–33. (In Russ.).2021 New Year’s Address by President Moon Jae-in. 2021. – 11 January. – URL: https://english1.president.go.kr/BriefingSpeeches/Speeches/9312021 New Year’s Address by President Moon Jae-in. 2021. – 11 January. – URL: https://english1.president.go.kr/BriefingSpeeches/Speeches/931Choi Y. A Middle Power’s Trade Policy under US – China FTA Competition: South Korea’s Double Hedging FTA Diplomacy. Contemporary Politics. – 2017. – 24 (2). – P. 233–249.Choi Y. A Middle Power’s Trade Policy under US – China FTA Competition: South Korea’s Double Hedging FTA Diplomacy. Contemporary Politics. – 2017. – 24 (2). – P. 233–249.Коргун И. А. South Korea Trade During COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives on Value Chains and US-CHINA Trade War // Asia and Africa Today. – 2021. – № 2. – С. 36–43.Korgun I. A. South Korea Trade During COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives on Value Chains and US-CHINA Trade War, Asia and Africa Today, 2021, No. 2, pp. 36–43.Patterson, D. Choi J. Diplomacy, Trade, and South Korea’s Rise to International Influence. – London : Lexington Books, 2019.Patterson, D. Choi J. Diplomacy, Trade, and South Korea’s Rise to International Influence. – London : Lexington Books, 2019.Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 57th Trade Day Ceremony. 2020. – 8 December. – URL: https://english1.president.go.kr/BriefingSpeeches/Speeches/919Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 57th Trade Day Ceremony. 2020. – 8 December. – URL: https://english1.president.go.kr/BriefingSpeeches/Speeches/919Sohn Y. South Korea under the United States–China Rivalry: Dynamics of the Economic-Security Nexus in Trade Policymaking // The Pacific Review. – 2019. – No. 6. – P. 1–22.Sohn Y. South Korea under the United States–China Rivalry: Dynamics of the Economic-Security Nexus in Trade Policymaking // The Pacific Review. – 2019. – No. 6. – P. 1–22.오수현, 라미령, 연원호. 역내포괄적경제동반자협정(RCEP)의 주요 내용 과 시사점 [Main Contents and Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)] // KIEP. 세계경제 표커스 = KIEP World Economy Focus. – 2020. – Vol. 3. – N 36. – URL: https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10102030000&bid=0004&list_no=3552&act=view.오수현, 라미령, 연원호. 역내포괄적경제동반자협정(RCEP)의 주요 내용 과 시사점 [Main Contents and Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)] // KIEP. 세계경제 표커스 = KIEP World Economy Focus. – 2020. – Vol. 3. – N 36. – URL: https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10102030000&bid=0004&list_no=3552&act=view.박정수, 정다정. G2 무역전쟁이 한국무역에 미치는 영향 = The Effect of G2 Trade War on Korean Trade// The Society of China Culture in Korea. 2020. – Vol. 65. – P. 265–286.박정수, 정다정. G2 무역전쟁이 한국무역에 미치는 영향 = The Effect of G2 Trade War on Korean Trade// The Society of China Culture in Korea. 2020. – Vol. 65. – P. 265–286.산업부, 자유무역협정(FTA) 이행 및 활용 유관기관 협의회 개최 [Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy held a meeting with Related Organizations to Implement and Utilize Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)]. – URL: https://www.korea.kr/news/pressReleaseView.do?newsId=156458382.산업부, 자유무역협정(FTA) 이행 및 활용 유관기관 협의회 개최 [Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy held a meeting with Related Organizations to Implement and Utilize Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)]. – URL: https://www.korea.kr/news/pressReleaseView.do?newsId=156458382.홍석빈. 우리나라 통상정책의 변화와 지속 방향 연구 - 박근혜 정부의 통상행정체계 개편을 중심으로 = The Changes and Continuities of Korean Government's International Trade Policy: An Analysis on the Reshuffle of Trade Administrative System of Park Administration // 무역학회지. – 2014. Vol. 39. – N 3. – P. 261–292.홍석빈. 우리나라 통상정책의 변화와 지속 방향 연구 - 박근혜 정부의 통상행정체계 개편을 중심으로 = The Changes and Continuities of Korean Government's International Trade Policy: An Analysis on the Reshuffle of Trade Administrative System of Park Administration // 무역학회지. – 2014. Vol. 39. – N 3. – P. 261–292.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.