mttpМеждународная торговля и торговая политикаInternational Trade and Trade Policy2410-73952414-4649ФГБОУ ВО "Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова"10.21686/2410-7395-2018-3-79-99mttp-256Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ИНТЕГРАЦИЯECONOMIC INTEGRATIONНАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ СИСТЕМЫ СТРАН БРИКС : ОБЩИЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВАNATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS OF BRICS COUNTRIES : GENERAL FEATURES AND PROSPECTS OF COOPERATIONГовороваА. В.GovorovaA. V.

Говорова Ангелина Валерьевна - инженер кафедры экономики инноваций экономического факультета МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова.

Москва, 119991, Ленинские горы, д. 1, строение 46.

Angelina V. Govorova - Engineer of Innovation Economics Department, Economics Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University.

1, building 46, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991.

angelinagovorova@yandex.ruМосковский государственный университет имени М.В. ЛомоносоваРоссияLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian Federation201823102018037999Copyright © Говорова А.В., 20182018Говорова А.В.Govorova A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/view/256

В настоящее время Россия является активным участником международных объединений как формальных, так и неформальных (например, БРИКС). На первый взгляд БРИКС – группа стран, не связанных между собой ни по географическому, ни по идеологическому параметрам. Однако многолетнее сотрудничество стран доказывает обратное: создаются новые инициативы, развивается совместная работа не только над экономическими, но и научно-исследовательскими и инновационными проектами. В данной статье проводится анализ общих черт национальных инновационных систем (НИС) стран и выделяются их отличительные особенности, например, важность национальных академий наук в рамках НИС, а также необходимость их рассмотрения в качестве дополнительных субъектов НИС. На первом этапе исследования анализируются позиции пяти стран БРИКС в ведущих международных рейтингах инновационной активности. На втором – проводится анализ среды функционирования (Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA), позволяющий оценить соотношение затрат и результатов инновационной деятельности. По результатам анализа выдвигается предположение относительно того, какая именно из стран БРИКС может стать потенциальным лидером дальнейшего инновационного сотрудничества стран.

Nowadays Russia is an active participant in international associations, both formal and informal (e. g. BRICS). At first glance, the BRICS is a group of countries that are not related either geographically or ideologically. However, long-term cooperation between the countries proves the opposite: new initiatives are being created, joint work is developing not only on economic, but also research and innovation projects. In this article there is the analysis about the existing features of the national innovation systems (NIS) of countries and highlights their distinguishing features, for example, the importance of national academies of Sciences in the framework of the NIS, as well as the need for their consideration as additional subjects of NIS. At  the  first stage  of  the study,  the  positions  of  the five BRICS countries in  the leading international rankings of innovation activity are analyzed. At the second stage-the analysis of the operating environment (Data Environment Analysis, DEA), which allows to estimate the ratio of costs and results of innovation. According to the results of the analysis, it is suggested which of the BRICS countries can become a potential leader in further innovative cooperation between the countries.

инновацииинновационная экономикарейтингнациональная инновационная системамеждународное сотрудничествоDEAinnovationinnovation economyratingnational innovation systeminternational cooperationDEAReferencesГаврилова В. Е., Говорова А. В. Возможно ли в России экономическое счастье по-китайски? // Вестник НГИЭИ. – 2017. – Т. 8, № 75. – С. 107–118.Gavrilova V. E., Govorova A. V. Vozmozhno li v Rossii ekonomi-cheskoe schast'e po-kitayski? [Is It Possible to Build Economic Happiness in Russian ‘in Chinese’?]. Vestnik NGIEI, 2017. Vol. 8, No. 75, pp. 107–118. (In Russ.).Говорова А. В. Роль «умных городов» в формировании цифровой экономики КНР // Трансформация бизнес-моделей в условиях цифровой экономики : сборник материалов научно-практической конференции «Неделя инноваций». 12-18 декабря 2017 г. – М. : ТЕИС, 2018. – С. 75–83.Govorova A. V. Rol' «umnyh gorodov» v formirovanii tsifrovoy ekonomiki KNR [The Role of Smart Cities in Shaping China's Digital Economy] Transformatsiya biznes-modeley v usloviyah tsifrovoy ekonomiki, sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Nedelya innovatsiy». 12–18 dekabrya 2017 g. Moscow, TEIS, 2018, pp. 75–83. (In Russ.).Голиченко О. Г. Национальная инновационная система России: состояние и пути развития. – М. : Наука, 2006.Golichenko O. G. Natsional'naya innovatsionnaya sistema Rossii: sostoyanie i puti razvitiya [National Innovation System of Russia: State and Ways of Development]. Moscow, Nauka, 2006. (In Russ.).Иванова Н. И. Наука в национальных инновационных системах // Инновации. – 2005. – № 2 (80). – C. 55–59.Ivanova N. I. Nauka v natsional'nyh innovatsionnyh sistemah [Science in National Innovation Systems]. Innovatsii, 2005, No. 2 (80), pp. 55–59. (In Russ.).Иванова Н. И. Национальные инновационные системы // Вопросы экономики. – 2001. – № 7. – C. 59–70.Ivanova N. I. Natsional'nye innovatsionnye sistemy [National Innovation System]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2001, No. 7, pp. 59–70. (In Russ.).Касенов Р. Р. Модель национальной инновационной системы // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. – 2013. – № 32 (323). – (Экономика.). – C. 52–56.Kasenov R. R. Model' natsional'noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Model of National Innovation System]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, No. 32 (323). (Ekonomika.), pp. 52–56. (In Russ.).Орда О. В. Технополисы как элемент инфраструктуры национальной инновационной системы // Экономический журнал. – 2011. – № 21. – C. 25–32.Orda O. V. Tekhnopolisy kak element infrastruktury natsio-nal'noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Technopolises as an Element of the Infrastructure of the National Innovation System]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2011, No. 21, pp. 25–32. (In Russ.).Федоров М. В., Пешина Э. В., Гредина О. В. Пентаспираль – концепция производства знаний в инновационной экономике // Управленец. – 2011. – № 3–4. – C. 4–12.Fedorov M. V., Peshina E. V., Gredina O. V. Pentaspiral' – kontseptsiya proizvodstva znaniy v innovatsionnoy ekonomike [Pentaseal – the Concept of Knowledge Production in the Innovation Economy]. Upravlenets, 2011, No. 3–4, pp. 4–12. (In Russ.).Afzal M. N. I. An Empirical Investigation of the National Innovation System (NIS) Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the TOBIT model// International Review of Applied Economics. – 2014. – N 4 (28). – C. 507–523.Afzal M. N. I. An Empirical Investigation of the National Innovation System (NIS) Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the TOBIT Model. International Review of Applied Economics, 2014, No. 4 (28), pp. 507–523.Bielicki M., Lesniak M. CEE Cross-Country Comparison of National Innovation Systems Efficiency: DEA Approach, 2016. – P. 87–95.Bielicki M., Lesniak M. CEE Cross-Country Comparison of National Innovation Systems Efficiency: DEA Approach, 2016, pp. 87–95.Cai Y. Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs’ National Innovation Systems : A Comparative Study Based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis // Economics Discussion Paper. – 2011. – January. – P. 2–25.Cai Y. Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs’ National Innovation Systems : A Comparative Study Based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis. Economics Discussion Paper, 2011, January, pp. 2–25.Cai Y., Hanley A. Building BRICS: 2-Stage DEA analysis of R&D efficiency // Kiel Working Paper. – 2012. – N 1788.Cai Y., Hanley A. Building BRICS: 2-Stage DEA analysis of R&D efficiency. Kiel Working Paper, 2012, No. 1788.Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D., Campbell D. F. The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation// Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. – 2012. – N 1 (1). – P. 1–12.Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D., Campbell D. F. The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2012, No. 1 (1), pp. 1–12.Carayannis E. G., Goletsis Y., Grigoroudis E. Multi-level Multi-stage Efficiency Measurement: the Case of Innovation Systems // Operational Research. – 2015. – N 2 (15). – P. 253–274.Carayannis E.G., Goletsis Y., Grigoroudis E. Multi-level Multi-stage Efficiency Measurement: the Case of Innovation Systems. Operational Research, 2015, No. 2 (15), pp. 253–274.Carayannis E. G., Grigoroudis E., Goletsis Y. A Multilevel and Multistage Efficiency Evaluation of Innovation Systems: A Multiobjective DEA approach // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2016. – N 62. – P. 63–80.Carayannis E. G., Grigoroudis E., Goletsis Y. A Multi-level and Multi-stage Efficiency Evaluation of Innovation Systems: A Multiobjective DEA approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, No. 62, pp. 63–80.Charnes A., Cooper W. and Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units // European Journal of Operational Research. – 1978. – Vol. 2. – P. 429– 444.Charnes A., Cooper W. and Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 429– 444.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M. and Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, Reference and DEA– Solver Software. – 1st ed. – Norwell : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M. and Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, Reference and DEA–Solver Software. 1st ed. Norwell, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development // EASST Review. – 1995. – № 1 (14). – P. 14–19.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 1995, No. 1 (14), pp. 14–19.Еtzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of University–Industry– Government Relations // Research Policy. – 2000. – № 2 (29). – P. 109–123.Еtzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of University–Industry– Government Relations. Research Policy, 2000, No. 2 (29), pp. 109–123.Freeman C. The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective // Cambridge Journal of Economics. – 1995. – N 19. – P. 5–24.Freeman C. The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, No. 19, pp. 5–24.Global Innovation Index 2018. Energixing the World with Innovation / edited by S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, S. Wunsch-Vincent. – 11th edition Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, 2018. – P. 1-3.Global Innovation Index 2018. Energixing the World with Innovation, edited by S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, S. Wunsch-Vincent. 11th edition Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, 2018, pp. 1–3.Gopalakrishnan S., Dasgupta J. Policies to Drive Innovation in India// The Global Innovation Index. – 2015. – P. 121–130.Gopalakrishnan S., Dasgupta J. Policies to Drive Innovation in India. The Global Innovation Index, 2015, pp. 121–130.Human Resources in R&D // UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2017.Human Resources in R & D. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2017.Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix,…, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. – 2012. – N 1 (3). – P. 25–35.Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix,..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2012, No. 1 (3), pp. 25–35.Liu X., White S. Comparing Innovation Systems : a Framework and Application to China’s Transitional Context // Research Policy. – 2001. – N 30. – P. 1091–1113.Liu X., White S. Comparing Innovation Systems : a Framework and Application to China’s Transitional Context. Research Policy, 2001, No. 30, pp. 1091–1113.Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. – London : Pinter Publishers,1992.Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers, 1992.Nelson R. R. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. – New York : Oxford university press, 1993.Nelson R. R. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. New York, Oxford university press, 1993.OECD National Innovation Systems // International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. – 1997. – № 1 (8). – P. 74.OECD National Innovation Systems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1997, No. 1 (8), pp. 74.The Global Competitiveness Report The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018 / edited by K. Schwab, 2017.The Global Competitiveness Report The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018, edited by K. Schwab, 2017.UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) UIS Statistics / UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). – URL: http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx (дата обращения: 31.07.2018).UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) UIS Statistics. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). Available at: http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx (accessed 31.07.2018).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.